Three cities that I would possibly like to live in that are not in Colorado are:
Boston, MA
Chicago, IL
Seattle, WA
For Boston, MA:
Size-48.4 square miles of land, it is not
extremely small or large, it's average, and it meets my criteria for living.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BostonPopulation-The population is an estimated 609,023 in 2008, which fits with my criteria of 100,000 to 1 or more million people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BostonScenery-From personally visiting Boston, there is not much scenery of mountains, only cityscape and water, which does not fit my criteria.
Transportation-Has a rail system, the
MBTA, an airport, Logan International, and highway systems. The average travel time is 31 minutes.This does meet my criteria for a city that I can live in.
http://www.cityofboston.gov/transportation/modes.aspSuccess-Boston is ranked #90 on Forbes list of best businesses and careers, which is not something I am looking for, I would rather have something more successful, so it does not fit for a city that I am looking for.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/1/bizplaces09_Best-Places-For-Business-And-Careers_MetroArea.htmlFor Chicago, IL:
Size-228.5 square miles, it is on the larger side, but it still fits my criteria.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_current_size_of_ChicagoPopulation-in 2000 was over 9 million, so today it can be estimated at over 11 million residents. This is over my 1 million residents so it would not be an ideal city for me to live in.
http://www.city-data.com/us-cities/The-Midwest/Chicago-Population-Profile.htmlScenery-I have been to Chicago before, and the main scenery is Lake Michigan and the skyscrapers such as the Sears Towers. I would prefer more land than buildings, so this would not be an ideal place for me to live in.
Transportation-Has two airports,
O'Hare International and Midway International, rail system, The
CTA, and taxis. This does fit my criteria for transportation.
http://www.explorechicago.org/city/en/travel_tools/transportation.htmlSuccess-Chicago is rated number 71 on Forbes list of best businesses, so it is better than Boston, but it is still not that high, which doesn't really fit my criteria.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/1/bizplaces09_Best-Places-For-Business-And-Careers_MetroArea_2.htmlFor
Seattle, WA:
Size-The size of Seattle is 83.87 square miles, which fits my criteria because it is not extremely large or too small.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeattlePopulation-The population of Seattle is 582,174, which is between 100,000 and 1 million, so it fits my criteria.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Seattle,-WashingtonScenery-Seattle has some great scenery, the Cascade Mountains, the Olympic Mountains, Mount Rainer, and is close to Lake Washington and Lake Union. This
definitely fits my criteria.
http://www.usatourist.com/english/places/washington/seattle.htmlTransportation-Seattle has an airport, Seattle-Tacoma International, taxis, and express buses. This is adequate transportation, without my own vehicle, so it fits my criteria.
http://www.usatourist.com/english/places/washington/seattle.htmlSuccess-Seattle is ranked number 17 on Forbes list for best businesses, which puts it way ahead of the other two cities, so it fits my criteria.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/1/bizplaces09_Best-Places-For-Business-And-Careers_MetroArea_7.htmlCost of Living:
Denver - is overall 105:95 compared to Fort Collins, and is 11% more expensive. If someone was making $50,000 in Fort Collins, they would be making $55,318 in Denver.
Boston - is overall 128:95 compared to Fort Collins, and is 35% more expensive. If someone was making $50,000 in Fort Collins, they would be making $67,305 in Boston.
Chicago - is overall 126:95 compared to Fort Collins, and is 33% more expensive. If someone was making $50,000 in Fort Collins, they would be making $66,697 in Chicago.
Seattle - is overall 132:95 compared to Fort Collins, and is 39% more expensive. If
someone was making $50,000 in Fort Collins, they would be making $69,617 in Seattle.